SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2553

ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Arvind Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
ICICI Bank Limited – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Veyanktesh Garg, Advocate, for the Appellant
Mr. Namish Nigotia, Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 09.01.2019 passed by the Civil Court whereby application under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC, for filing rejoinder has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the respondent-Bank.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondents filed written statement and they have taken certain preliminary objections in the written statements and further also denied parawise averments made in the plaint.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that after filing of the written statement by the respondents, issues were framed by the Civil Court and on the basis of averments made in the written statement, an issue No.4 has been framed.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that after framing of the issue by the Civil Court on the basis of pleading in the written statement, the petitioners were left with no other choice except to file an application under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC for seeking permission to file rejoinder to the written statement.

6. Learned counsel for the peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top