ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Arvind Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
ICICI Bank Limited – Respondent
ORDER
1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 09.01.2019 passed by the Civil Court whereby application under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC, for filing rejoinder has been dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the respondent-Bank.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondents filed written statement and they have taken certain preliminary objections in the written statements and further also denied parawise averments made in the plaint.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that after filing of the written statement by the respondents, issues were framed by the Civil Court and on the basis of averments made in the written statement, an issue No.4 has been framed.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that after framing of the issue by the Civil Court on the basis of pleading in the written statement, the petitioners were left with no other choice except to file an application under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC for seeking permission to file rejoinder to the written statement.
6. Learned counsel for the peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.