SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1016

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Jeeta Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
D.S. Gharsana, Advocate, S.S. Rajpurohit, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.23/2022, Police Station Surpaliya, District Nagaur for the offence punishable under Sections 376 and 376(2)(N) of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prosecutrix roamed along with the petitioner at so many places and during this period, prosecutrix did not raise any hue & cry; prosecutrix is a major lady and if anything has happened with the prosecutrix, that happened with her consent; challan of the case has already been presented; the petitioner is in the judicial custody; and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

6. accordingly, the bail application u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top