SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1042

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Nandgopal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sampat Prajapat, Advocate, Shrawan Bishnoi, Advocate, Bhagat Dadhich, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.368/2022, Police Station Bilara, District Jodhpur for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the offences alleged to has been committed by the petitioner are triable by Magistrate. The petitioner is in the judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Nandgopal S/o Hanuman Ram, shall be enlarged on bail in F.I.R. No.368/2022, Police Station Bilara, District Jodhpur provided he furnishes a pers

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top