SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2485

PANKAJ BHANDARI, ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Manish Yogi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shailesh Prakash Sharma, Advocate, Naved Rafiq, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Petitioner has preferred this civil writ petition aggrieved with the order dated 02.12.2021 passed by the Central administrative Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur (for short 'the learned Tribunal') in Oa No. 604/2018, whereby the Original application of the respondent-applicant was allowed and the order dated 16.08.2018 passed by the petitioners was quashed and the petitioners were directed to consider the case of the applicant-respondent for compassionate appointment in light of RBE circular dated 30.12.2019, if he is otherwise found fit for appointment on compassionate grounds.

2. It is contended by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the RBE circular dated 30.12.2019 could not be given a retrospective effect. It is also contended that order dated 16.08.2018 was passed in furtherance of the RBE circular dated 21.03.2018. It is also contended that if the RBE circular dated 30.12.2019 was given retrospective effect then RBE circular dated 21.03.2018 should also be given retrospective effect and in that case the respondent-applicant was not entitled for compassionate appointment as he was son of second wife of the deceased-railway employee.

3. It is contended by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top