IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Bora Narayanamma, D/o. Late B. Ramulu – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India, Represented By General Manager – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. delay in application context discussed. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 12) |
| 3. rationale and urgency for compassionate appointments. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. legal precedence on compassionate appointment delays. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. assessment of financial distress for appointments. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. outcome and directive for reconsideration. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 7. final judgment and order for relief. (Para 22 , 23) |
ORDER :
Tuhin Kumar Gedela, J.
Heard, Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for the respondents.
1. Embittered with the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”), in O.A.No.1534/2014 pronounced on 27.12.2018 rejecting the case of the petitioner, who was the applicant in the O.A. for compassionate appointment on the ground of delay, the present writ petition has been filed.
2. The parties are arrayed as in the present writ petition.
3. The contour of facts leading to the filing of the present writ petition are that, the petitioner/daughter of the deceased employee (B.Ramulu) states that on
Sushma Gosain vs. Union of India
Umesh Kumar Nagpal vs. State of Haryana
Compassionate appointment policies prioritize immediate relief for families of deceased employees, and delays must be evaluated in context rather than strictly adhered to, especially when financial d....
Delay in application for compassionate appointment can be excusable if adequately explained, especially when the applicant's family faces financial distress, emphasizing the intent to provide immedia....
Compassionate appointment limited to immediate financial distress post-employee death; 23-year delay disqualifies claim despite valid adoption.
The need for immediacy in providing compassionate appointment and disentitling relief due to undue delay.
Compassionate appointment applications by minor dependents must be made within prescribed scheme time-limits; failure to adhere bars consideration post-attainment of majority.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.