IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Bora Narayanamma, D/o. Late B. Ramulu – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India, Represented By General Manager – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background facts of the deceased and application for compassionate appointment. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. respondents' arguments against the grant of compassionate appointment. (Para 5 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. purpose of compassionate appointment per supreme court’s rationale. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. delay in application impacts claim for compassionate appointment. (Para 10 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. guidelines on compassionate appointment under railway board orders. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 7. court's observations on the delay and initial approvals. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. conclusion and order to grant compassionate appointment. (Para 22 , 23) |
ORDER :
Tuhin Kumar Gedela, J.
Heard, Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for the respondents.
1. Embittered with the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”), in O.A.No.1534/2014 pronounced on 27.12.2018 rejecting the case of the petitioner, who was the applicant in the O.A. for compassionate appointment on the ground of delay, the present writ petition has been filed.
2. The parties are arrayed as in th
Sushma Gosain vs. Union of India
Umesh Kumar Nagpal vs. State of Haryana
Delay in application for compassionate appointment can be excusable if adequately explained, especially when the applicant's family faces financial distress, emphasizing the intent to provide immedia....
Compassionate appointment policies prioritize immediate relief for families of deceased employees, and delays must be evaluated in context rather than strictly adhered to, especially when financial d....
Compassionate appointment limited to immediate financial distress post-employee death; 23-year delay disqualifies claim despite valid adoption.
The need for immediacy in providing compassionate appointment and disentitling relief due to undue delay.
Compassionate appointment applications by minor dependents must be made within prescribed scheme time-limits; failure to adhere bars consideration post-attainment of majority.
Compassionate appointment is an exception, not a right, intended for immediate relief to families in financial crisis following the death of a breadwinner, and delays in application undermine this pu....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.