Back
INDERJEET SINGH
Jaipur Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Akshay Vishnu Real Estate Private Limited – Respondent
ORDER
1. Application for early listing is allowed.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-JDA challenging the order dated 16.09.2019 passed by the Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur whereby the reference application filed by the respondent-auction purchaser was allowed and the petitioner-JDA was directed to pay a sum of Rs.11,70,000/- to the respondent-auction purchaser along with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of depositing the said amount till the date of order i.e. 16.09.2019.
3. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner-JDA issued a notice for auctioning the plots of land at Farm Houses in Taru Vihar Farm Yojna, Ballupura, Jaisinghpura Khor, which was published in the daily newspaper on 19.01.2006. The respondent-auction purchaser participated for plot No.76 in the said auction held on 23.01.2006. The respondent-auction purchaser being the highest bidder for the said plot No.76, its sale was confirmed in his favour and he deposited the amount of Rs. 11,70,000/- with the JDA and for the remaining amount a demand letter was issued by the petitioner-JDA requiring the respondent-auction purchaser to deposit the remaining amount wit
The court upheld the provisions of the Jaipur Development Authority Act, 1982, and the applicable interest rates under the Raj. Improvement Trust (Disposal of Urban Land) Rules, 1974, in determining ....
Point of Law : Estoppel.—When one person has, by his declaration, act or omission, intentionally caused or permitted another person to believe a thing to be true and to act upon such belief, neither ....
Cancellation of allotment due to payment defaults by the winning bidder in a public auction.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of strict compliance with auction terms and conditions, balanced with the consideration of communications and extensions provided by....
The appellant cannot be penalized for the action/inaction of the UIT, and the court held that the direction to pay interest for the balance amount was not tenable as it was based on a rule applicable....
The court upheld the legality of forfeiting auction deposits due to non-payment, affirming that the auction terms did not require a hearing prior to cancellation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
