SAMEER JAIN
Jaipur Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Boutique Hotels India Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
(Sameer Jain, J.)
The instant writ petition is filed under Article(s) 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, whereby, a challenge is made against the order dated 14.07.2008, passed by the Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur in Appeal No. 117/2008 titled as Boutique Hotel (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Jaipur Development Authority & Ors.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner-Jaipur Development Authority (hereinafter, JDA) has submitted that the respondent-company submitted application(s) dated 20.08.2005 and 05.12.2005 before the JDA for seeking allotment of the land in question. Thereafter, on 01.04.2006, the matter was considered by the Board of Infrastructure Development and Investment Promotion (hereinafter, BIDI). Upon paying due heed to the said application(s), BIDI resolved to approve the allotment of the land forming part of Khasra Nos. 8 and 9, situated in Village Ballupura, Patwar Circle Sumel, Tehsil & District-Jaipur. Subsequently, under the chairmanship of the Chief Secretary, the matter was further considered by the State Level Empowered Committee (hereinafter, SLEC) on 10.08.2006. In pursuance to the BIDI Resolution, it was determined by the SLEC
Baldev Singh Dhanju v. Chandigarh Housing Board AIR 1990 P&H 41
Jaipur Development Authority v. Shyam Lal Verma
Karnataka Industrial Areas Dev. Board v. Prakash Dal Mills AIR 2011 SC 1570
Rayalseema Paper Mills Ltd. v. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh AIR 2002 SC 3699
The court established that acceptance of delayed payments by the State constituted a deemed extension of time for contract performance, reinforcing the obligation to execute lease deeds.
The court established that higher authorities cannot exercise statutory powers of lower authorities, and actions against interim orders are illegal.
Non-compliance with payment schedules in allotment agreements leads to automatic cancellation of rights to the property.
The failure to establish lawful possession and the invalidity of the allotment order led to the dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing jurisdictional limits in civil suits regarding land allotments.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that delay and inaction on the part of the petitioner can disentitle them from the relief sought, especially when no right had accrued in their fav....
Writ petitions can be maintained against administrative actions affecting contracts, especially when principles of natural justice and public policy are at stake.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.