HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Devendra Kachhawaha, J.
Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 483 of 2022
Decided On : 08-02-2022
Bail Application - COVID-19 Guidelines - The court granted bail to the petitioner based on the circumstances of the case, including the nature of the offense, the petitioner's time in custody, and the expected trial duration.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. due to being in judicial custody for an offense under Section 392/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Finding of the Court:
The court, considering the circumstances, granted bail to the petitioner based on the offense being triable by a Magistrate, the filing of the charge-sheet, the petitioner's time in custody, and the expected trial duration.
Issues: Bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for an offense under Section 392/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the nature of the offense, the petitioner's time in custody, and the expected trial duration.
Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing the specified bonds.
JUDGMENT
Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, as per guidelines, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts, therefore, hearing of the matter is being taken up only through video conferencing.
2. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.487/2021, Police Station Kotwali Banswara, District Banswara, registered for the offence punishable under Section 392/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Heard and considered arguments advance by learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing and learned Public Prosecutor, present-in-person. Perused the material available on record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that offence is triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed; petitioner is behind the bars since 08.12.2021; no investigation or recovery is pending against the petitioner; and trial will take time. With these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the petitioner.
5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioner and stated that five other cases are registered against the accused-petitioner out of which, three cases are of similar nature. It is further stated that one scooty has been recovered from the accused-petitioner.
6. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that cases registered against the petitioner mentioned at S.Nos.3, 4 and 5 are consecutively registered at same Police Station.
7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly looking to the facts that offence is triable by the First Class Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed; accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 08.12.2021; and trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
8. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner, Rajesh S/o Harish, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.487/2021, Police Station Kotwali Banswara, District Banswara, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/-with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
The court considered the circumstances of the case, including the nature of the offense, the petitioner's time in custody, and the expected trial duration, in granting bail.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the circumstances of the case, including the filing of the charge-sheet, the grant of bail to co-accused persons, and the expected lengthy trial d....
The court considered the circumstances, including the absence of grievous injuries and the compromise between the parties, in granting bail to the petitioner.
The court considered the prolonged custody, absence of injury, and expected lengthy trial period in allowing the bail application.
The court considered the circumstances of the case and the time spent in custody as key factors in granting bail to the accused-petitioners.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and the unprecedented situation of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the expected lengthy trial duration.
The court established that prolonged custody and the nature of the offences can be sufficient grounds for granting bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
The court established that bail should be granted based on the principle of equality among co-accused and the consideration of trial duration, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
The court established that bail can be granted based on the totality of circumstances, including the duration of custody and precedents in similar cases, without delving into the merits of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.