HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Devendra Kachhawaha, J.
Sonu @ Pata @ Yogendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 228 of 2022
Decided On : 20-01-2022
Bail Application - Criminal Law - The court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in judicial custody in connection with multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, considering the lack of grievous injuries, compromise between the parties, and the lengthy trial process.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. as he was in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.373/2021, Police Station Sadar Bikaner, District Bikaner, registered for various offenses under the Indian Penal Code.
Finding of the Court:
The court, in consideration of the circumstances, granted bail to the petitioner, Sonu @ Pata @ Yogendra Singh, with the condition of furnishing a personal bond and surety bonds.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail despite the charges against him and the opposition from the Public Prosecutor.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the lack of grievous injuries, the compromise between the parties, and the lengthy trial process as reasons to grant bail to the petitioner.
Final Decision: The bail application of the petitioner was allowed, and he was ordered to be released on bail upon fulfilling the specified conditions.
JUDGMENT
Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, as per guidelines, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts, therefore, hearing of the matter is being taken up only through video conferencing.
2. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.373/2021, Police Station Sadar Bikaner, District Bikaner, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 458, 323, 504, 336, 354 and 143 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing and learned Public Prosecutor, present-in-person. Perused the material available on record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case; as per prosecution, petitioner along with other co-accused persons entered into the house of the complainant with weapons but not with an intention to cause injuries; compromise has been taken place between the parties; copy of affidavit of complainant (victim) anjali has been filed along with the present bail application; and trial will take time. With these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the petitioner.
5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioner and stated that earlier, three other cases have been registered against the accused-petitioner. He further stated that as per prosecution, accused-petitioner along with other co-accused persons entered into the house of the complainant with weapons.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly looking to the facts that none of the injuries have been found as grievous in nature; compromise has also been taken place between the parties; petitioner is behind the bars approximately for one month; further investigation and trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner, Sonu @ Pata @ Yogendra Singh S/o Mool Singh, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.373/2021, Police Station Sadar Bikaner, District Bikaner, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
The court considered the circumstances, including the absence of grievous injuries and the compromise between the parties, in granting bail to the petitioner.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the circumstances of the case, including the filing of the charge-sheet, the grant of bail to co-accused persons, and the expected lengthy trial d....
The court considered the prolonged custody, absence of injury, and expected lengthy trial period in allowing the bail application.
The court considered the circumstances of the case, including the nature of the offense, the petitioner's time in custody, and the expected trial duration, in granting bail.
The court considered the circumstances of the case and the time spent in custody as key factors in granting bail to the accused-petitioners.
The court established that bail can be granted based on the totality of circumstances, including the duration of custody and precedents in similar cases, without delving into the merits of the case.
Granting bail based on the precedent of a similar case without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case.
Prolonged pre-trial detention is against the concept of liberty and can be a basis for granting bail.
Grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the expected lengthy trial duration.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.