SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1847

DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Sonu @ Pata @ Yogendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Amit Gour, Advocate, A.R. Choudhary, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, as per guidelines, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts, therefore, hearing of the matter is being taken up only through video conferencing.

2. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.373/2021, Police Station Sadar Bikaner, District Bikaner, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 458, 323, 504, 336, 354 and 143 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing and learned Public Prosecutor, present-in-person. Perused the material available on record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case; as per prosecution, petitioner along with other co-accused persons entered into the house of the complainant with weapons but not with an intention to cause injuries; compromise has been taken place between the parties; copy of affidavit of complainant (victim) anjali has been filed along with the present bail application; and trial will take time. With these submissions,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top