SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1919

DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Jagdish – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shaitan Singh, Advocate, Vikram Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, as per guidelines, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts, therefore, hearing of the matter is being taken up only through video conferencing.

2. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.10/2021, Police Station Sanderao, Dist. Pali for the offences punishable under Sections 353, 307/34 I.P.C. & Section 3/25 of the arms act.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing and learned Public Prosecutor, present in person. Perused the material available on record.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is allegation of firing shots in air against the accused- petitioner; accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 11.02.2021; charge-sheet has been filed; and trial will take time; therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioner and stated that earlier six other cases are registered against the accused-petitioner.

6. Having regard to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top