SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1901

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Bheru Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
N. K. Gurjar, Advocate, Shrawan Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Lawyers are not physically appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).

2. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.138/2021, Police Station Baneda, District Bhilwara for the offence under Section 377 of the I.P.C. and under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Bovine animal act.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the material available on record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge-sheet in the case has been filed. He further submits that the petitioner is facing incarceration since 05.09.2021. The conclusion of the trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case as also the present situation of the country due to pandemic of corona virus (COVID-19), in particular the jails, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

6.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top