Back
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Rakesh @ Peeja – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Lawyers are not physically appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).
2. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners who are in custody in connection with F.I.R.(C.R.) No.09/2022, Police Station Banar (Jodhpur Commissionerate) for the offence under Sections 307, 353, 279, 336, 283, 379 and 120B of IPC and Section 4/21 of MMDR act.
Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are facing incarceration for almost a month. There is no case of the like nature pending or decided against the petitioners. He further submits that no injury has been sustained by anybody in the present incident. Therefore, it is prayed that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case as also the present situation of the country due to pandemic of corona virus (COVID-19), in particular the jails, this Court d
The court may consider the unprecedented situation of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in the jails, as a justifiable ground for granting bail.
Grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the expected lengthy trial duration.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and the unprecedented situation of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the unprecedented situation of the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on the situation of the jails, justifying the release of the petitioner on bai....
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the interpretation of Section 439 Cr.P.C. in light of the similarity of the case with the co-accused persons who had been enlarged on bail and the....
The court may consider the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the prolonged trial period in deciding bail applications.
The court considered the petitioner's incarceration, absence at the time of the incident, and the lack of pending or decided cases against the petitioner, along with the unprecedented situation of th....
The court considered the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the absence of specific allegations of dowry demand in granting bail to the accused.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
