JUDGMENT

1. In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its highly infectious Omicron variant, lawyers have been advised to refrain from conning to the Courts.

2. This writ petition has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:

"i) That the impugned order dated 02.03.2016 passed by Board of Revenue, Ajmer, Annexure-8 be quashed and set aside; and

ii) That the impugned order dated 25.03.2013 passed by Sub Divisional Officer, Pilibanga, Annexure-5 be quashed and set aside; and

iii) By an appropriate Order the record of the case be called for;

iv) The application preferred by the Non-petitioner no.l be dismissed with costs throughout;

v) In the alternative to above

(iv), if the Hon'ble Court comes to a different conclusion, the impugned orders Annexures be set aside and the matter be remanded back with the direction to the Non-Petitioner no.4 to decide the application afresh after affording opportunity to the parties and in accordance with law."

3. As the pleaded facts would reveal, the respondent No.l moved an application under Section 251-A of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 1955") before the Assistant Collector & Sub Divisional Officer,