SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2044

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Rameshwar Vyas, J.
Jagseer Singh Ranjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 169 of 2022
Decided On : 25-02-2022

Advocates appeared:
Kuldeep Sharma, Advocate, S.S. Rajpurohit, Advocate, Avinash Godara, Advocate

The court may grant bail to an appellant under the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act based on the circumstances and the bail granted to similarly situated co-accused, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Headnote:

Bail - SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act - The court granted bail to the appellant based on the fact that similarly situated co-accused had already been enlarged on bail, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 14-a(2) SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the rejection of his bail application by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act Cases, Hanumangarh.

Finding of the Court:

The court, after considering the rival contentions and the fact that similarly situated co-accused had been granted bail, deemed it just and proper to grant bail to the appellant, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside.

Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant should be granted bail under the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act, considering the rejection of his bail application by the Special Judge.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision to grant bail was based on the fact that similarly situated co-accused had already been enlarged on bail, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal and ordered that the accused-appellant be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and sureties to the satisfaction of the trial court.

JUDGMENT

Rameshwar Vyas, J. - The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14-a(2) SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 470/2021 registered at Police Station Hanumangarh Junction, Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections 307, 323, 341, 382, 143, 336, 427, 325, 326 IPC and Section 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va), 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the order dated 1.2.2022 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act Cases, Hanumangarh whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that co-accused Pawan has already been enlarged on bail by this Court in the matter of S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail application No. 36/2022 decided on 24.1.2022, another co-accused Sanjay and Pawan were enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of S.B. Cr. appeal No. 1195/2021 and 878/2021 vide order dated 20.12.2021 and 20.11.2021, respectively. another co-accused 'a', being minor was enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of S.B. Cr. Revision Petition No. 955/2021 vide order dated 10.1.2022. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the case of the present appellant is on similar footing to that of the co-accused who have already been enlarged on bail. In the above, circumstances, learned counsel for the appellant prays that the appeal filed by the appellant deserves to be allowed.

3. On the contrary, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal.

4. Having regard to the rival contentions of the learned counsel for the parties and after perusal of the material available on record, in the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly looking to the fact that similarly situated co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant the bail to the appellant.

5. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 1.2.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of atrocties) act Cases, Hanumangarh is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant, Jagseer Singh @ Ranjeet Singh arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 470/2021 registered at Police Station Hanumangarh Junction, Hanumangarh shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 50,000/-each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top