SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 602

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
Mohammad Atik - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
CRLMP / 30 / 2025
Decided On : 17-02-2025

Advocates:
Ms. Sapna Vaishnav, Mr. Ziyal Haque, Mr. Shahadat Ali, Mr. Deepak Chowdhary, GA-cum-AAG, Mr. Narendra Gehlot, Mr. OP Mehta, Mr. Moti Singh Rajpurohit, Mr. Ridmal Khan, Mr. Zubin Ahmad, Mr. Tanay Jain, Mr. Harshwardhan Rajpurohit, Mr. Anand Singh, ACP, Boranada

The court ruled that an FIR cannot be quashed when ongoing investigations reveal potential offences, allowing petitioners to present their case to the Investigating Officer.

Headnote:

(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - Petitioners sought to quash FIR No.84/2022 for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC, citing prior investigation and changed circumstances - Court declined to quash the FIR but allowed petitioners to file a representation before the Investigating Officer. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Protection from Arrest - Court granted interim protection from arrest until filing of the challan, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation considering the petitioners' representation. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners filed a misc. petition for quashing an FIR registered for serious offences, arguing that they were not beneficiaries and sought protection due to their age and status.

Findings of Court:
The court found no grounds to quash the FIR but allowed the petitioners to present their case to the Investigating Officer.

Issues: The main issues were whether the FIR should be quashed and the appropriateness of granting interim protection from arrest.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the FIR should not be quashed as the investigation was ongoing and allowed the petitioners to present their case to the Investigating Officer.

Result: Misc. petition disposed of; FIR not quashed.

ORDER :

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.)

The instant misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (528 B.N.S.S.) have been filed by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.84/2022 registered at Police Station Dev Nagar, District Jodhpur for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that firstly after investigation, Police proposed a final report in this case and now, after changed circumstances the Investigating Officer wants to arrest the petitioners. In these circumstances, counsel for the petitioners submits that they want to give a detailed representation before the Investigating Officer who shall investigate the matter thoroughly but till filing of the challan, protection may be provided to the petitioners because four of the petitioners are senior citizen and one of the petitioners is merely an employee of the Marwar Muslim Educational and Welfare Society and not a beneficiary.

3. Per contra, learned AAG as well as counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the prayer made by counsel for the petitioners.

4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the material available on record, particularly looking to the fact that the FIR in this case has been registered in the year 2022. Furthermore, in earlier investigation the Police is going to file a final report and now, in changed circumstances the offences have been proved against the petitioners.

5. In view of the above, I am not inclined to quash the FIR.

6. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to file a representation alongwith relevant documents before the concerned Investigating Officer within a period of two weeks. The concerned Investigating Officer shall take up all the facts as well as representation, if any, filed on behalf of the petitioners and complete the investigation by considering them strictly in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of filing of the representation.

7. Thereafter, if the Investigating Officer wants to file challan against the petitioners then the petitioners shall move an appropriate misc. petition or avail appropriate remedy, if any occasion arises.

8. In the meanwhile and till filing of the challan, the petitioners shall not be arrested in connection with FIR No.84/2022 registered at Police Station Dev Nagar, Police Jodhpur for offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC.

9. The instant misc. petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of accordingly. Stay petition is also disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top