PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Nemi Chand S/o Malaram Bhambhu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, J.
1. This writ petition has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
Any other order which may be considered just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner company. The cost be also awarded in favour of the petitioner company.”
2. As per the pleaded facts, the petitioner-Company issued a Commercial Vehicle Package Policy to the respondent/applicant in respect of goods carrying commercial vehicle bearing registration no. RJ-07-GC-7148. The said policy was to remain effective for the period from 06.03.2020 to 05.03.2021, and the total sum insured under the policy was Rs. 24,00,000/-. The respondent-applicant was to be indemnified in respect of any damage to the insured vehicle duri
B.V. Nagaraju vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. (1996) 4 SCC 647
Lakhmi Chand vs. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. (2016) 3 SCC 100
Manmohan Nanda vs. United India Assurance Company Ltd. (2022) 4 SCC 582
Manjeet Singh vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. (2018) 2 SCC 108
New India Assurance Company Limited vs. Pradeep Kumar
Shivram Chandra Jagarnath Cold Storage and Another vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd. and Others
Point of Law : Contention of fabrication of documents (Invoice no. 23) is not related to the damage caused to the vehicle and the insurance claim.
A claim can be settled on a non-standard basis despite breach of insurance policy conditions if not deemed fundamental; overloading does not invalidate all claims.
The Permanent Lok Adalat has jurisdiction over insurance claims, and while due process was followed, the award must reflect the depreciated value of repairs.
The burden of proof in insurance claims lies with the insurer to establish policy violations, and claims cannot be repudiated without substantial evidence supporting such breaches.
The Permanent Lok Adalat must assess the merits of insurance claims and cannot substitute its reasoning for that of the insurance company, especially in cases of procedural lapses.
Mistaken involvement of a party in insurance claims without proper disclosure invalidates awards; intentional misrepresentation is deemed fraud.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.