SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, INDER JIT SINGH
Jodhpur Industries – Appellant
Versus
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Ms. Sonia Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Surjeet Singh, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. R.B. Sami, Advocate

ORDER

Heard Ms. Sonia Sharma, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. R.B. Sami, Advocate, for the opposite parties.

2. M/s. Jodhpur Industries and Ms. Nisha (the Insured) have filed above complaint for directing The New India Assurance Company Limited (the Insurer) to pay (i) Rs.11681327/- with interest @18% per annum, from 01.09.2016 till actual payment, as the insurance claim; (ii) Rs.10/- lacs, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; (iii) Rs.10/- lacs, as business loss; (iv) costs of litigation; and (v) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the case.

3. The facts as stated in the complaint and emerged from the documents attached with the complaint are as follows:—

(a) M/s. Jodhpur Industries (the Insured) was a proprietorship firm and engaged in manufacture and sale of bread and biscuit. Ms. Nisha (complainant-2) was proprietor of the Insured. The Insured took a shed at B-24-A, RIICO Industrial Area, Rajgarh, Rajasthan, on rent through lease deed dated 22.03.2014 from Prem Kumar Bansal and installed manufacturing unit i



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top