SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 94

SUDESH BANSAL
Ritesh Gocher Son Of Shri Nandgopal Gocher – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S.Gharana, Mr. Rajveer Sharma Mr. Sandeep Garssa, Mr. Ram Pratap Saini, Mr. Aamir Khan, Smt. Prakash Yadav, Mr. Sanjay Bharati, Mr. Imran Khan, Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura, Mr. G.L. Sharma, Mr. Surya Prakash, Mr. Pradeep Singh, Mr. Tanuj Gupta, Dr. Anil Sharma, Mr. Tanveer Ahamad, Mr. R.D. Meena, Mr. N.L. Verma, Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya, Mr. Manish K. Saini, Mr. Vinod Jhajharia, Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Dr. Saugath Roy, Mr. Vijay Pathak, Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki, Mr. Vikas Kabra, Mr. Naveen Dhuwan, Mr. Birendra Singh, Mr. Shashank Shekhar Pachauri, Mr. Ashwani Kumar Kushwah, Ms. Komal Kumari Giri, Mr. Bajrang Sepat, Mr. P.C. Sharma, Ms. Madhumita Das, Mr. Mukesh Choudhary, Mr. P.L. Saini, Mr. Banvari Lal Saini, Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma, Mr. Kailash Kumawat, Mr. Surendra Singh Shekhawat, Mr. Yojan Sharma, Mr. Raj Kumar Goyal, Mr. Gaurav Saraswat, Mr. Mahendra Sharma, Mr. Vijay Pathak, Mr. Gordhan Singh, Mr. Shribhan Gurjar, Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun, Mr. Avtar Singh Rathore, Mr. Rohan Agarwal for Mr. J.K. Moolchandani, Mr. Sukhraj Singh Rathore, Ms. Mahi Yadav, Mr. Niraj Kumar Yadav, Mr. Tarun Kumar Mishra, Mr. Suresh Kumar, Mr. Govind Upadhyay, Mr. Munesh Bhardwaj, Mr. Aditya Mishra, Mr. Tej Singh, Mr. Yogesh Chawla, Mr. Raj Kumar Kasana, Mr. Gaurav Sharma Saraswat, Mr. R.K. Gouttam, Mr. G.S. Gouttam, Mr. Tushar Saraswat, Mr. Mukesh Kumar,Mr. Aniruddha Sharma
For the Respondent: Dr. Vibhuti Bhushan Sharma, AAG

JUDGMENT :

1. In SBCWP No.19106/2022 application (1/2023) has been filed seeking impleadment as party respondent.

2. For reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Amended cause title, enclosed with application, is taken on record.

3. In all these writ petition, petitioners have raised common grievance for not issuing the experience certificate in the prescribed format, due to which petitioners are unable to upload their experience certificate while submitting application forms for the respective posts of Nursing officer/pharmacist pursuant to advertisement dated 16.11.2022.

4. The grievance in respect of issuing experience certificate in the prescribed format has been dealt with and decided by the Principal Seat at Jodhpur in case of Lala Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan & ors. in SBCWP No.19677/2022 and other connected writ petitions vide order dated 5.1.2023. The Court has observed thus:-

    “11. In a bid to ward off inconvenience and hardship to the candidates and in order to expedite and streamline the process of issuing experience certificate, it is deemed expedient and hence ordered that:-

(i) Henceforth, the candidates will be required to submit their application forms in

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top