ORDER :

“Law comes to the assistance of the vigilant not of the sleepy.” - Salmond.

Fixing a lifespan for availing legal remedy and object for fixing time limit for litigation is for the purpose of general welfare. Otherwise there would be no end of any litigation unless the limitation is prescribed.

1. This review petition is time barred by 2264 days. The review petitioner (State/Respondents) has approached this Court seeking review of the order dated 07.09.2016 passed by the Court by which the batch of writ petitions filed by the writ petitioners were allowed with the following observations and directions:-

“Taking into consideration the facts and the Rules referred to above, I am of the opinion that the respondents should have considered case of the petitioners for grant of study leave as their admission in PG course was after entering into service. The embargo to complete three years service before seeking study leave would not apply to the petitioners being probationers thus cannot be considered to be temporary employees.

Accordingly, these writ petitions are allowed. The respondents are directed to grant study leave as per Rules 110 and 122 of the Rules for a period of 36 months,