Back
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Okesh Kumawat S/o Shri Ram Kishor Kumawat – Appellant
Versus
Sarvepalli Radhkrishnana Rajasthan Ayurvedic University – Respondent
ORDER :
1. There are no lawyers appearing on behalf of the parties, as they are abstaining from the work.
2. Since similar controversy is involved in these writ petitions, they are being decided by this common order. In SBCW No. 13769/2022, the following prayers are made:
(B) By an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to allow and permit the petitioner to fill their examination form without any late fees and further be directed to permit the petitioner to undertake the examination commencing from 19.09.2022 for their remaining subjects of B.A.M.S. first year professional along with their B.A.M.S. Second year Professional Examination and further declare the results and issue the mark sheets.
(C) By an appropriate writ order or direction, the petitioner institute may kindly be directed to consider the candidature of the petitioner in accordance with the National Commission for Indian Syst
Court in interest of justice directs that actual sixth attempt to be permitted to petitioners to appear in examination.
The definition of 'attempt' in examination regulations includes partial attendance, justifying discharges after failure to clear exams.
Students impacted by COVID-19 disruptions are entitled to appear for final professional exams as a one-time remedy.
The court established the principle that amended regulations would be applicable to students admitted prior to the amendments but have not yet passed out, and the maximum prescribed time period under....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
