SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 637

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.
Sahil Bangra S/o Shadev Ram and ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnana Rajasthan Ayurvedic University and ors. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8767, 8850, 8852, 8822, 8828, 8829, 3194, 3575, 3578, 3579, 3582, 3583, 3713, 3771, 8851, 8849, 3581, 3573, 3586, 3196, 3288, 3539, 3563 of 2023
Decided On : 07-07-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Nitin Goklani, Mr. Chatur Bhuj
For the Respondent: Mr. Suneil Purohit

Headnote:

Indian Medicine Central Council (Minimum Standards of Education in Indian Medicine) Regulations, 1986 - National Commission for Indian System of Medicine (Minimum Standards of Undergraduate Ayurveda Education) Regulations, 2022 - Attempts to clear a professional year examination - Examination commencing - Order or direction - Marginal variation - Contextual facts - Held, Court thus observes that present petitioners are entitled to appear in examination of remaining Subjects of Course in question, and respondents are not justified in denying them such a lawful opportunity - Judgments cited at Bar on behalf of respondents do not render any assistance to their case, as in said judgments, adjudication process was under Regulations of 2016, whereas today, it is under Regulations of 2022 - Petitions allowed.

ORDER :

1. Since all the instant petitions involve a common controversy, though with marginal variation in the contextual facts, therefore, for the purposes of the present analogous adjudication, the facts and the prayer clauses are being taken from the above-numbered S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8767/2023, while treating the same as a lead case.

2. The prayer clauses read as under:

“It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this petition for writ may kindly be allowed and:

A] By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the conduct and action of the respondents of not allowing the petitioner to undertake the examination of the remaining subjects of their IInd Professional B.A.M.S. Examination along with his IIIrd professional B.A.M.S. Examination may kindly be declared as arbitrary and illegal and may kindly be set aside.

B] By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to allow and permit the petitioners to fill their examination form without any late fees and further be directed to permit the petitioner to undertake the examination commencing from 10 July 2023 for the remaining subjects of their B.A.M.S. Second year Professional examinations along with their B.A.M.S. Third year Professional Examination and further declare the results and issue the mark sheets.

C] By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the candidature of the petitioner in accordance with the National Commission for Indian System Of Medicine (Minimum Standards of Undergraduate Ayurveda Education) – Regulations 2022.

D] The cost of the litigation may be awarded in favour of the humble petitioners.

E] Any other appropriate order that this hon’ble court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be also passed in favour of the petitioner.”

3. Brief facts of the case, as placed before this Court by learned counsel for the petitioners are that the petitioners got enrolled themselves with the respondent-University for pursuing B.A.M.S (Bachelor of Ayurveda Medicine and Surgery) Course in the year 2017. The petitioners cleared all the subjects of their B.A.M.S Ist Year Examination and entered into the second year of the said Course. However, thereafter, the petitioners could not pass in all the Subjects of the second year examination of the Course in question, in their first attempt.

3.1. The petitioners appeared in the further attempts for their remaining subjects of the second year examination along with the third year examination of the Course in question. However, due to Covid-19 pandemic, the petitioners could not appear in all the consecutive attempts of second year examination of the course in question.

3.2. The Course in question is governed by the Indian Medicine Central Council (Minimum Standards of Education in Indian Medicine) Regulations, 1986. The said Regulations stood amended in the year 2016, wherein it was provided that the students are entitled to four attempts for clearing the examinations of the Course in question. Thereafter, the National Commission for the Indian System of Medicine vide order dated 15.12.2021 provided for three more attempts i.e. in total seven attempts (as mercy chances) to clear the examinations of the Course in question.

3.3. The respondents issued an intimation dated 31.05.2023 regarding conducting of examination to be scheduled from 10.07.2023.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the National Commission for the Indian System of Medicine has introduced the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine (Minimum Standards of Undergraduate Ayurveda Education) Regulations, 2022, having overriding effect over the Regulations of 1986, and therefore, the students of the Course in question are to be governed by the Regulations of 2022 and not by the Regulations of 1986 and its amended notifications.

4.1. It was further submitted that the Regulations of 2022 does not prescribe for any cap on the n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top