REKHA BORANA
Ankit Gaur S/o Shri Birdi Chand Gaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 30.05.2016 whereby an application of the petitioner for compassionate appointment has been rejected. The reason for rejection is that the brother of the deceased employee does not fall within the definition of ‘dependent’ as defined under Section 2(c) of the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules of 1996’).
2. The case of the petitioner is that his brother Dr. Nitesh Gaur met with an accident and unfortunately, expired. The family comprises of his mother, father and the present petitioner being the younger brother of the deceased employee. The deceased was not married and hence his parents as well as his younger brother were totally dependent on the deceased employee. It has further been submitted that the mother of the deceased is suffering from cancer and the present petitioner, that is, his younger brother, is an unemployed student. Therefore, there being no bread earner in the family after the death of the employee, the petitioner, who was totally dependent on the deceased employee at the time of his death and be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.