SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(UK) 42

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Appellant
Versus
AJAY SINGH – Respondent


Table of Content
1. facts surrounding appointment of deceased's brother. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding applicability of the compassionate appointment rules. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court's observations on compassionate appointment criteria and timelines. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. conclusion of the appeal and setting aside of the prior order. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT :

Alok Mahra, J.

1. The present Special Appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and order dated 27.03.2018 passed in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 359 of 2010.

2. The facts of the case are that sister of the writ petitioner (respondent herein) was appointed on the post of Assistant Teacher, Primary School vide order dated 02.11.2001 by the District Education Officer (Basic), Udham Singh Nagar and was posted in Primary School, Kanori (Bajpur). These schools were run by the Basic Shiksha Parishad, Uttarakhand. She died in harness on 05.06.2005. At the time of her death, she was unmarried. Petitioner/respondent, who was unemployed real brother of the deceased, applied for appointment under the U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 (as applicable in Uttarakhan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top