IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
DINESH MEHTA, J.
Ranjeet Kumar Maru, S/o. Shri Dinesh Kumar Maru & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Rajasthan, Through Its Director State Health and Family Welfare Society, Government of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 1489, 211, 213, 254, 258, 260, 306, 311, 316, 317, 318, 321, 324, 327, 328, 329, 333 of 2023
Decided On : 03-02-2023
Bonus marks - Date of counting of experience certificate - Direction to issue certificate upto recruitment - Prayed that respondents be directed to reckon their experience for purpose of bonus marks upto last date of submitting application form and a direction be issued to issue certificate upto recruitment Notification - If stand of petitioners is accepted, then date of counting of experience certificate will be a floating/fluctuating date.
Finding of the Court:
In case of Anil Bishnoi (supra), Court is of considered view that State has committed no error of law in fixing date to be date for purpose of counting experience - In opinion of Court, if stand of petitioners is accepted, then date of counting of experience certificate will be a floating/fluctuating date, inasmuch as, last date of submitting application form often changes due to extension or otherwise and if same is permitted, it would be iniquitous to persons who are filling application form immediately on opening of online portal or some days before last date of submitting application form.
Result: Applications dismissed.
ORDER :
1. By way of present writ petitions, petitioners have prayed that the respondents be directed to reckon their experience for the purpose of bonus marks upto the last date of submitting application form i.e. 24.11.2022 and a direction be issued to issue certificate upto recruitment Notification dated 16.11.2022.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners argued that the respondents have fixed the last date for counting the experience certificate to a day prior to the first date of submitting application form i.e. 23.11.2022.
3. Mr. Jangid, learned counsel for the petitioners argued that there is no statutory backup or rationale behind fixing such date for the purpose of counting experience.
4. Mr. K.S. Rajpurohit, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent – State at the outset submitted that the issue involved in the present writ petitions has been set at rest by this Court in the judgment dated 05.10.2017 passed in the case of Anil Bishnoi & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 796/2016) and after dealing with all arguments, this Court has upheld the stand of respondent – State in fixing the date for the purpose of counting experience.
5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and following the reasoning given in the case of Anil Bishnoi (supra), this Court is of the considered view that the State has committed no error of law in fixing the date i.e. 23.11.2022 to be the date for the purpose of counting experience. In the opinion of this Court, if the stand of the petitioners is accepted, then the date of counting of experience certificate will be a floating/fluctuating date, inasmuch as, the last date of submitting application form often changes due to extension or otherwise and if the same is permitted, it would be iniquitous to the persons who are filling application form immediately on opening of the online portal or some days before the last date of submitting application form.
6. In the case of Anil Bishnoi (supra), this Court has held thus:-
In view of the discussion above, this Court holds that for the purposes of calculation of bonus marks, experience of a candidate upto 01.03.2013, as provided in Clause 8 of the advertisement can alone be reckoned.
7. Following the adjudication made in the case of Anil Bishnoi (supra), these writ petitions are dismissed.
8. The stay applications also stand dismissed.
Purpose of calculation of bonus marks, experience of a candidate as provided in Clause 8 of advertisement.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to consider experience certificates and the principles of natural justice in determining eligibility for the post of Laboratory Ass....
Experience certificates must be issued based on verified experience, without automatically conferring rights to bonus marks.
The main legal point established is that experience certificates for bonus marks should be issued based on the candidates' actual work performed, without considering their entitlement for bonus marks....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of a case, the principles of natural justice, and the consequences of a previous....
The experience certificate for services rendered outside the state cannot be considered for appointment and awarding bonus marks in a different state.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.