Back
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Harsh Raj Verma, S/o. Raj Kumar Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical Education Department Group-1, Government of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. All the instant special appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 20.04.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Hon’ble Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13776/2017 & other connected petitions, therefore, the appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.
1.1. For the sake of brevity and convenience, the facts, as pleaded in one of the petitions being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13564/2017, before the learned Single Judge, are being taken for the present analogous adjudication.
1.2. Since in the above-numbered DBSAW No.911/2018, which has been preferred against the common impugned judgment, so far it operates, in the aforementioned S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13564/2017, the Dental Council of India (DCI) has been arrayed as a party respondent, therefore, though the ‘DCI’ also has preferred some of the above-numbered special appeals, the ‘DCI’ shall be referred to as ‘respondent-DCI’, in the present judgment.
1.3. These appeals have been preferred claiming, in sum and substance, the following reliefs:
“It is, therefore, humble and most respectfully prayed that your lordship may very graci
Admissions to BDS courses granted under relaxed percentile criteria by the State were illegal, emphasizing that only the Central Government holds the authority to set qualifying standards for NEET.
(1) Judicial review of administrative action is permissible on grounds of illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety – An administrative decision is flawed if it is illegal.(2) If reducing ....
: If the criteria for minimum percentile is further reduced, this Court is doubtful about the standard of the students taking admission and is wary of their potential to undertake the professional co....
Merely because interim orders have been passed which were adinterim exparte orders without the benefit of the arguments of the other side on the basis of the replies filed and the pleadings, such int....
Discretion under regulations for educational admissions must be exercised considering only pertinent factors, and the Union's refusal to further lower NEET percentile requirements was lawful given th....
The discretion vested by Regulation 2(d) is applicable in a situation where there are insufficient candidates in the respective categories who have scored the minimum marks in the NEET. Interference ....
The court upheld the minimum percentile requirement for postgraduate medical admissions, asserting the importance of maintaining high educational standards in medical education, which cannot be compr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
