PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Jagdish Anjana S/o Shri Balaram Ji Anjana – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Civil Writ Petition has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:-
ii. hold the Respondents are bound by principle of promissory estoppel and cannot change or turnaround from the assurance made by them in the Excise Policy of the year 2021-22.
iii. the additional Composite fee taken by the Respondent from the Petitioner for year 2021-22 be adjusted in the renewed license of 2022-23 or in alternate refunded back to the petitioner.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has raised the issue of composite fee having been charged for the purpose of license for allotment of particular shop, in accordance with the Rajasthan Excise Policy for the year 2021-22.
2.1 Learned counsel submits that the Rajasthan Excise Department conducted e-au
Assistant Excise Commissioner & Ors. v. Issac Peters & Ors. (1994) 4 SCC 104
Bharti Cellular Ltd. v. Union of India
Excise Commissioner v. Issac Peter
Government of A.P. v. Anabeshahi Wine & Distilleries (P) Ltd.
Govt. of A.P. v. Anabeshahi Wine & Distilleries (P) Ltd.
Har Shankar v. Excise & Taxation Commissioner
In Re : Natural Resources Allocation
Khardah Company Ltd. v. Raymond & Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Panna Lal v. State of Rajasthan
Shyam Telelink Ltd. v. Union of India
State of M.P. v. KCT Drinks Ltd.
State of Orissa & Ors. v. Harinarayan Jaiswal & Ors.
State of Orissa v. Narain Prasad (1996) 5 SCC 740
State of Punjab v. Devans Modern Breweries Ltd.
State of U.P. v. Devi Dayal Singh
Union of India v. Bhimsen Walaiti Ram
Union of India Vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.