ARUN MISHRA, S.ABDUL NAZEER, M.R.SHAH
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Association Of Unified Telecom Service Providers Of India Etc. Etc. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ARUN MISHRA, J.
1. In the appeals, the question involved is with respect to the definition of gross revenue as defined in clause 19.1 of the licence agreement granted by the Government of India to the Telecom Service Providers. The case has a chequered history and the scenario projected is that even after the licensees agreeing with the revenue sharing regime under the Telecom Policy of 1999 for the last two decades, definition of gross revenue has been litigated upon, though the intendment was to keep it free from the same and various disputes. Notwithstanding the fact that disputes have been raised, and despite the fact what is the meaning to be given to gross revenue, was agreed upon between the parties. The telecom sector was liberalized under the National Telecom Policy, 1994 and various licenses were issued to companies under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. The licences granted to the service providers stipulated a fixed licence fee, which was payable by the service providers every year.
2. However, as the said fixed license fee was very high and the
Union of India v. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India
J.K. Industries Limited v. Union of India
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences v. Satchikitsa Prasarak Mandla
Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd. v. State of Gujarat
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pushpalaya Printers
Industrial Promotion & Investment Corporation of Orissa Ltd. v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Vania Silk Mills v. C.I.T., Ahmedabad
Swiss Ribbons v. Union of India
South Gujarat Roofing Tiles Manufacturers v. State of Gujarat
General Assurance Society Ltd. v. Chandmull Jain
M.R. Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd. v. Som Datt Builders Ltd.
Jal Mahal Resorts Private Limited v. K.P. Sharma
A.P. Dairy Development Corporation Federation v. B. Narasimha Reddy
Re : Natural Resources Allocation
State of Orissa v. Harinarayan Jaiswal
Har Shankar v. Excise & Taxation Commissioner
Government of A.P. v. Anabeshahi Wine & Distilleries (P) Ltd.
Excise Commissioner v. Issac Peter
State of Orissa v. Narain Prasad
State of M.P. v. KCT Drinks Ltd.
State of Punjab v. Devans Modern Breweries Ltd.
Khardah Company Ltd. v. Raymond & Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Assistant Excise Commissioner v. Issac Peters
Shyam Telelink Ltd. v. Union of India
Bharti Cellular Ltd. v. Union of India
Central Inland Water Transport Corporation v. Brojo Nath Ganguly
Cauvery Coffee Traders, Mangalore v. Hornor Resources (International) Co. Ltd.
Union of India v. Bombay Tyres International Pvt. Ltd.
IFB Industries Ltd. v. State of Kerala
Commissioner of Central Excise, Madras v. Addison & Co. Ltd.
Southern Motors v. State of Karnataka
Maya Appliances Pvt. Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Rajputana Trading Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.