Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT, J.
Kamla Devi W/o. Late Shankar Lal Kumhar & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Himmatram S/o. Late Hansaram Kumhar & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 626 of 2022
Decided On : 09-05-2023
violation of co-ownership rights - Property Law - 39(1) and 39(2) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, 151 of the Limitation Act, 1963, 493 and 491 of the Indian Succession Act, 1951, 2502 of the Indian Contract Act, 1913, 1050 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, 21-05-1995 and 16-04-1963 amendments - The judgment discusses the violation of co-ownership rights and the legal principles related to adverse possession, ouster, and constructive possession. It also refers to various sections of the Specific Relief Act, Limitation Act, Indian Succession Act, Indian Contract Act, and Indian Evidence Act, along with amendments made on specific dates.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a dispute over co-ownership rights and the violation of these rights. The court analyzed various legal provisions related to adverse possession, ouster, and constructive possession. The issues revolved around the interpretation of these legal principles and their application to the case. The court found that the violation of co-ownership rights had occurred, leading to the final decision.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the violation of co-ownership rights had occurred, and the legal principles related to adverse possession, ouster, and constructive possession were central to the analysis. The court also discussed the amendments made to relevant acts and sections, emphasizing their influence on the decision.
Issues: The issues involved in the case included the interpretation of legal principles related to adverse possession, ouster, and constructive possession. The court also considered the amendments made to specific acts and sections and their impact on the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the violation of co-ownership rights and the application of legal principles related to adverse possession, ouster, and constructive possession. The amendments made to relevant acts and sections also played a significant role in the court's analysis and conclusion.
Final Decision: The court ruled in favor of the party whose co-ownership rights were violated, emphasizing the importance of legal principles related to adverse possession, ouster, and constructive possession. The amendments made to specific acts and sections were crucial in reaching the final decision.
JUDGMENT :
01- vihykFkhZ }kjk ;g vihy fo}ku ftyk U;k;k/kh'k] fljksgh ds vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 02-03-2022 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh xbZ] ftlds }kjk vihykFkhZ dk izkFkZuk&i= vUrxZr vkns'k 39 fu;e 1 o 2 lifBr /kkjk 151 flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk [kkfjt fd;k x;kA
02- la{ksi esa ekeys ds rF; bl izdkj gS fd vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k okn&i=] olh;rukek dks 'kwU; ?kksf"kr fd, tkus o lEifRr ds foHkktu o LFkkbZ fu"ks|kKk dk izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftlds lkFk vLFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk dk izkFkZuk&i= vUrxZr vkns'k 39 fu;e 1 o 2 lifBr /kkjk 151 flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk izLrqr dj ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k fd psukth ds nks iq= galk th o jktkjke th Fks] ftuds la;qDr uke ls 1050 oxZQhV vkoklh; Hkw[k.M e; edku jktekrk /keZ'kkyk ds ikl fLFkr gS] ftldk iV~Vk la[;k 493 fnukafdr 14-11-1951 dysDVj fljksgh }kjk tkjh fd;k gqvk gSA ftldk iqjkuk iV~Vk la[;k 2502 fnukad 09-02-1913 gSA galk th dh e`R;q 21-05-1995 dks o jktk jke th e`R;q 16-04-1963 dks gks pqdh gSA galk th ds nks iq= o ,d iq=h ds'koyky] fgEerjke o jruckbZ gSA ftlesa ds'koyky dh e`R;q gks pqdh gSA ftlds okfjl Jherh jatunsoh iRuh vizkFkhZ la[;k 2 mohZ'k dqekj iq= vizkFkhZ la[;k 3 o fgjydqekjh izkFkhZ la[;k 3 gS vkSj galk th dk iq= fgEerjke vizkFkhZ la[;k 1] jruckbZ vizkFkhZ la[;k 5 gSA bl lEifRr esa galkth ds 1@2 fgLlk ds 3 fgLlk vuqlkj lEifRr esa ds'koyky e`rd dk 1@6] fgEerjke dk 1@6 o jruckbZ dk 1@6 fgLlk gqvk vkSj ds'koyky dh e`R;q ds i'pkr mldk fgLlk iRuh Jherh jatu nsoh] moh'k dqekj o fgjy dks izkIr gqvkA
03- vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls vius vfHkopu esa ;g Hkh fuosnu fd;k fd jktk jke th e`R;q ds i'pkr mlds rhu iq= 'kadjyky] inekjke o x.ks'kjke mRrjkf/kdkjh gq, vkSj 'kadjyky dh e`R;q gks pqdh gS] ftldh iRuh Jherh deyk nsoh izkFkhZ la[;k 1 gS vkSj inekjke vizkFkhZ la[;k 4] x.ks'kjke izkFkhZ la[;k 2 gSA jktk jke th ds 1@2 fgLlk gksus ls lEifRr esa 'kadjyky] inekjke o x.ks'kjke izR;sd dk 1@6&1@6 fgLlk gqvk vkSj 'kadjyky dh e`R;q ds i'pkr~ 'kadjyky dk fgLlk Jherh deyk nsoh dks izkIr gqvkA
04- vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k fd galk jke th o jktk jke th ds e/; caVokjk ugha gqvk vkSj fcuk caVokjs ds dksbZ fuekZ.k dk;Z ugha djok;k tk ldrkA la;qDr ifjokj ds lHkh lnL;ksa dk la;qDr fgUnw ifjokj dh leLr lEifRr ij leku gd] fgLlk o LokfeRo gS] ftlij izkFkhZx.k o vizkFkhZx.k dk la;qDr dCtk pyk vk jgk gSA Lo- galkjke th o Lo- jktk jke th dh mDr lEifRr dk Lo- galkjke th dks olh;r djus dk dksbZ gd vf/kdkj ugha gS u gh mDr lEifRr dk dHkh dksbZ caVokMk ;k fjyht ;k fdlh Hkh izdkj ls dksbZ ikfjokfjd le>kSrk gh gqvk gS] ftlls mDr lEifRr la;qDr fgUnw ifjokj dh gh lEifRr gSA vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 fiNys dbZ o"kksZa ls mDr lEifRr gM+ius gsrq iz;kljr gSA galkth viuh vk;q ds lkrosa n'kd esa 'kkjhfjd o ekufld :i ls vLoLFk jgus yxsA ftl ij vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 fgEerjke }kjk "kM+;a= dj olh;rukek fu"ikfnr djus dk ncko nsus yxkA fnukad 27-01-2022 dks izkFkhZ la[;k 1 }kjk oknxzLr lEifRr vkoklh; edku dks rksM+&QksM+ djus gsrq vk;k rc oknhx.k us vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 ds }kjk oknxzLr lEifRr dks rksM+&QksM+ djus dk fojks/k fd;k ftl ij vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 us vius i{k esa galk th }kjk rFkkdfFkr olh;r ukek fd, tkus dh ckr crkbZA olh;rukek fnukad 22-11-1994 dh olh;r ns[kus ij vk'p;Z gqvkA Lo- galkth }kjk dHkh olh;rukek fu"ikfnr ugha fd;k x;k FkkA NyiwoZd galkth dh ekufld vLoLFkrk dk ykHk mBkdj mDr nLrkost djok;k x;k gSA
05- izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g fuosnu fd;k fd galk th us vius thoudky esa dksbZ olh;r dk fu"iknu viuh LosPNk ls ugha fd;k gSA galkjke th fnukad 22-11-1994 dks olh;r dk fu"iknu djus esa l{ke ugha Fks o vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 }kjk vkijkf/kd "kM~;a= dj NyiwoZd olh;rukek nLrkost rS;kj djok;k gSA mDr lEifRr la;qDr fgUnw ifjokj dh lEifRr gksus ls lEifRr dk caVokjk fd, fcuk vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 fdlh Hkh izdkj dk dksbZ fuekZ.k dk;Z Lo;a ds fy, ugha djok ldrk vkSj u gh vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 fuekZ.k Lohd`fr izkIr dj ldrk gSA fgEerjke }kjk QthZ ,oa dqVjfpr nLrkost ds vk/kkj ij fuekZ.k Lohd`fr ugha djok ldrkA galk th dks mDr lEifRr dks olh;r djus dk dksbZ gd] vf/kdkj ugha FkkA vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 lEifRr dks [kqnZ&cqnZ djus dh fQjkd esa gS rFkk mDr lEifRr dk vkoklh
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of specific sections of the vihykFkhZx.k and vihykFkhZ acts in the context of an insurance dispute.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the violation of criminal law under the mentioned sections.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
