SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 493

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
PANKAJ BHANDARI, BHUWAN GOYAL, JJ.
State Of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Kumar Son Of Balvan Sngh – Respondents
D.B. Criminal Death Reference No. 3 of 2021
Decided on : 31-05-2023

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 366, 376 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 313 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 5, 6, 42 - Evidence Act - Section 65-B - Criminal Death - Power to examine accused - Criminal Death Reference been moved by Special Judge for confirmation of death to accused at Police Station - Held, State has not shown anything to prove appellant would commit acts of violence or is a continuing threat to society conduct prison has been described as satisfactory no doubt that appellant has committed an abhorrent crime - Court believe that incarceration serve as sufficient punishment penitence for his actions absence of any material to believe that if allowed to grave and serious threat to society reformation rehabilitation impose the sentence for offence - Appellant is partly allowed.

JUDGMENT :

Pankaj Bhandari, J.

1. Present D.B. Criminal Death Reference No.03/2021 has been moved by the Special Judge, POCSO Court, Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) for confirmation of death sentence dated 17.03.2021 given to accused – Sunil Kumar in Sessions Case No.11/2021 – State of Rajasthan Versus Sunil Kumar, FIR No.0087/2021 registered at Police Station Pilani, District Jhunjhunu. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 16.03.2021 and the order of sentence dated 17.03.2021, accused – Sunil Kumar has preferred D.B. Criminal appeal No.66/2021. By the aforesaid judgment of conviction dated 16.03.2021, accused was convicted for offence under Sections 366(A), 376(2)(i)(j)(m), 376(AB) of IPC and Section 5(m)/6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “the POCSO Act”), in alternate Section 376(AB) of IPC and 5(m)/6 of POCSO Act. For offence under Section 366A of IPC, he was sentenced for 10 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs.25,000/-and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo 3 months additional imprisonment. For offence under Section 376(2)(i)(j)(m) of IPC, he was sentenced for life imprisonment till his natural life and a fine of Rs.25,000/-and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo 3 months additional imprisonment. For offence under Section 376(AB) of IPC, he was sentenced for life imprisonment till his natural life and a fine of Rs.25,000/-and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo 3 months additional imprisonment. For offence under Section 5(m)/6 of POCSO Act, he was awarded death penalty. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. Succinctly stated the facts of the case are that a written report (Exhibit-P9) was given to the SHO by Rahul (PW-5), brother of the victim, aged about 16 years. The said report reads as under:-xxxxxx

    ^^lsok esa

Jheku~ Fkkukf/kdkjh egksn;]

iqfyl Fkkuk&fiykuhA

fo"k;%&esjh cgu jkf/kdk dk vigj.k dj cykRdkj djus ckcr~A

egksn;]

mijksDr fo"k; vUrZxr fuosnu gS fd eSa jkgqy iq= chj flag tkfr&ukbZ fuoklh&tljkijw] gky&[kkfr;ksa dk tksgM+] ढk.kh&';ksM dk jgus jk.kk] ru&nsojksM dk jgus okyk gwW vkt fnukad 19-02-2021 dks le; djhc 5%15 lka;dky eSa ?kj ds viuh cguksa ds uke Øe'k% fiz;k 10 o"kZ] eksfudk mez 8 o"kZ]

xxxxx mez 5 o"kZ [ksy jgk Fkk rHkh ,d lQsn jax dh LdwVh ij ,d O;fDr gekjs ikl vk;k vkSj dgk fd euh”k dk ?kj dgk ij gSA ¼Kkr jgs euh"k esjk cM+k HkkbZ gS½ mlds tokc esa eSusa dgk fd esjk HkkbZ dgh ckgj x;k gqvk gSA fQj mlus dgk fd esjh LdwVh dk lhlk ¼lkbM Xykl½ ढhyk gks x;k gS] rks mldks VkbZV djus dk ikuk yknsA rRi'pkr eS nkSMdj vius ?kj ikuk ykus pyk x;kA vkSj okfil vkdj mldh LdwVh ds lkbZM Xykl dks ml ikus ls eSus vkSj O;fDr us mldks Bhd djus dh dksf'k'k dh] ysfdu og Bhd ugha gqvkA mlds ckn eSa ikuk ?kj ij j[kus x;k vkSj eSus ikuk j[kdj viuk dksV iguk vkSj ckgj vk;k] rks og O;fDr esjh lcls NksVh cgu jkf/kdk ds ikl [kM+k Fkk vkSj ckdh nksuks cgus lkbZfdy pyk jgh FkhA og eq>s cksyk dh lkeus ds isVªksy iEi ij rsy Myokus tk jgk gwa vkSj esjh NksVh cgu dks cksyk ?kqeus pysxhA rHkh xxxxx us mlds lkFk tkus ds fy, xnZu ls gka Hkh HkjhA vkSj ml O;fDr us xxxx dks LdwVh ds vkxs [kM+k dj fy;k vkSj fiykuh dh rjQ LdwVh rsth ls Hkxk nhA rc eS rqjar viuh cgu ls lkbfdy ysdj mldk ihNk fd;k] ysfdu og cgqr nwj fudy pqdk fiykuh dh rjQA mlds ckn eSusa okfil tk dj lkjk ?kVukØe eSus esjs HkkbZ dsk crk;kA fQj esjs HkkbZ us fiykuh iqfyl Fkkuk tk dj bl ?kVuk ds ckjs esa crk;kA rc fiykuh Fkkus dh iqfyl esjs HkkbZ ds lkFk ekSds ij vkbZ vkSj geus o iqfyl us feydj esjh cgu dks ryk'k fd;kA ryk'k ds nkSjku gekjs dks lwpuk feyh dh esjh cgu fey xbZ gS] ftldks fpM+kok ds ljdkjh vLirky esa ysdj x;s gSA rc eS esjs ?kj okyksa ds lkFk fpMkok ljdkjh vLirky esa vk;k rks esjh cgu ;gka ij ygwywgku gkyr esa feyhA ftldk MkWDVj bZykt dj jgs FksA esjh cgu ds lkFk ml O;fDRk us xyr dke cykRdkj fd;k gS] ftldks eSa lkeus vkus ij igpku ldrk gwa ml O;fDr ds ikl tks LdwVh Fkh mlds uacj vkjts&18&,l&07 Fks] iwjs uacj eSa ugh ns[k ik;kA dk;Zokgh ds fy, fjiksVZ nsrk gwa dk;ZOk

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top