SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 518

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
NUPUR BHATI, J.
U.P. Ceramics And Potteries Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12087, 12090 of 2019
Decided on : 18-07-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vineet Dave
For the Respondent: Mr. Sandeep Shah, Sr. Adv. & AAG with Mr. Nishant Bapna

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Companies Act 1956 - Agricultural land - Sale-deed - Agreement on valuation of stamp fees - Held, reason for issuing impugned notices by respondents is only on ground that use of land since was mentioned in sale-deeds dated for installation of 2 MW Solar plant is also not justified as it is settled proposition of law that market value of land, which has to be registered, has to be assessed on basis of nature of property on date of execution of instrument and not on basis of prospective use of land - It is an admitted position that assessment, when was done while treating land to be agricultural land at time of execution of sale-deed, stamp duty and registration charges have been duly paid by petitioner as determined by Sub-Registrar - Court finds that the matters require interference - Writ petitions allowed

JUDGMENT :

1. Since both these petitions raise a common question of fact and law, this Court proposes to dispose of these petitions by this common order.

2. For the convenience, the facts of S.B. Civil Writ Petition NO.12087/2019 are taken into consideration which has been filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:

    “i . the order dated 18.5.2016(Annexure-5) passed by the Collector (Stamps) in Stamp Case No.08/16 may kindly be declared illegal and quashed and set aside;

ii. the order dated 10.06.2019 (Annexure-7) passed by the Rajasthan Tax Board-Ajmer in Revision Petition No.1446/2016 may kindly be quashed and set aside;

iii. the communication dated 17.02.2016 (Annexure-3) issued by the Sub-Registrar-Kolayat may kindly be declared illegal and be quashed and set aside;

iv. the notice dated 16.07.2019 (Annexure-8) issued by the Sub-Registrar-Kolayat may kindly be declared illegal and be quashed and set aside;

v. the respondents may kindly be restrained from taking any coercive action against the petitioner for recovery of the impugned demand raised against the petitioner.”

3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a company incorporated and registered under the Companies Act 1956, and the petitioner company is engaged in manufacturing and trading of crockery and other pottery items as well as setting up of solar plants. The petitioner purchased agricultural land bearing Khasra No.77/04/2 having total area of 16 bighas situated at Gram-Nokha @ DaiyaTehsil-Kolayat No.1 District-Bikaner through sale-deed dated 15.04.2013(Annex.1) from Sh. Manok Kumar Bhari and Sh. Jai Kishan Bhari, i.e, respondents No.4 & 5.

4. After execution of the aforesaid sale-deed dated 15.04.2013, the petitioner presented the said document for the purpose of registration before the Sub-Registrar, Kolayat, Bikaner, that is, respondent No.3. The Sub-Registrar, Kolayat, Bikaner, after conducting enquiry, registered the aforesaid agreement on valuation of stamp fees of Rs.22,350/-and thereafter returned the documents to the petitioner. It was stated that at the time of execution of the sale-deed, the land so purchased by the petitioner was an agricultural land and accordingly was recorded in the revenue records. After the registration of the aforesaid document, an audit objection was raised that the stamp duty paid on the aforesaid document is not properly valued and is under valued.

5. Thereafter, after a lapse of about 2 years and 10 months, the Sub-Registrar, Kolayat, Bikaner, while taking into consideration the unfounded audit objection, issued notice to the petitioner company on the premise that the sale-deed has been under-valued for the purpose of levy of stamp duty. In the meanwhile, vide order dated 14.08.2013 (Annex.2) the land purchased by the petitioner came to be converted into commercial land for the purpose of installation of solar plant.

6. Subsequent to the above, the Sub-Registrar, Kolayat, Bikaner, vide communication dated 17.02.2016 (Annex.3) requested the Deputy Inspector General (Registration) – cum – Collector (Stamps), i.e, respondent No.2 to initiate proceedings of Reference in the matter of valuation of the said document under Section 51 (2) of Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998 (for short, ‘the Act of 1998’) while treating that the said document executed between Sh. Manoj Kumar Bhari and Sh. Jai Kishan Bhari, i.e, respondents No.4 and 5 and the petitioner company to be under-valued. Upon receipt of the request for Reference, the Collector (Stamps), Bikaner Circle, Bikaner, registered the matter as Stamps Case No.08/2016 (Sub Registrar-Kolayat Vs. Shri Manoj Kumar Bhari & Ors.) and issued show cause notice under Section 51(3) of the Act of 1998 read with Rule 65(1) of the Rajasthan Stamp Rules, 2004 dated 18.02.2016 (Annex.4) to the petitioner as well as the private respondents.

7. Vide order dated 18.05.2016 (Annex.5), the Collector (Stamps), Bikaner Circle, Bikaner, accepted the reference made

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top