SAURABH LAVANIA
Seksaria Behta Sugar Factory Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[Saurabh Lavania, J.]
1.Heard Sri Mudit Agarwal, Advocate assisted by Ms. Shagun Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajesh Tewari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of U.P.
In the present petition, a challenge has been made to the order dated 15.12.2004 passed by opposite party No. 3-Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Lucknow Division, Lucknow in Revision No. 123/201-02. A challenge has also been made to the order dated 24.7.2002 passed by the opposite party No. 4-Up Zila Adhikari, Biswan, District Sitapur, in a stamp case No. 1/17/1987.
2. By the order dated 24.7.2002 passed by the opposite party No. 4, in a proceedings initiated under Section 47(A) of the Stamp Act, after holding that the land in issue i.e. Plot/Gata No. 403 area 0.295 has been purchased for industrial and commercial purposes, the petitioner was directed to deposit/remove the deficiency of stamp on the document i.e. registered sale-deed dated 28.10.1999, which was executed in favour of the petitioner by Santosh Kumar, Lalta Prasad and Som Kumar. This order was assailed by the petitioner in the revision No. 1/17/1987, as provided under Section 56 of Stamp Act, w
The Institute of the Franciscan Clarist Sisters v. State of U.P. and others
Surendra Singh and another v. State of U.P. and others
Vijai Kumar v. Commissioner, Meerut Division, Meerut
Kishore Chandra Agrawal v. State of U.P. and others, 2007(10) ADJ 607 (DB) (LB)
Kaka Singh v. Additional Collector and District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue)
Sumati Nath Jain v. State of U.P. and another
Pushpa Sareen v. State of U.P.
Reena Gupta v. State of UP and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.