IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Farjand Ali, J.
Kan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Suspension of Sentence Application No. 79 of 2023 in Criminal Revision Petition No. 359 of 2023
Decided On : 05-04-2023
Suspension of Sentence - Criminal Law - The court allowed the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C. and ordered that the sentence passed against the petitioner shall remain suspended till final disposal of the revision, and he shall be released on bail with certain conditions.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment of two years for the offence under Section 304-A IPC. The petitioner was on bail during trial and appeal. The hearing of the revision petition would likely take a long time.
Finding of the Court:
The court, considering the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, and the fact that the accused-petitioner was on bail during the course of trial and appeal, allowed the application for suspension of sentence and ordered the release of the petitioner on bail with certain conditions.
Issues: The issues involved the appreciation of evidence brought on record and the decision on the application for suspension of sentence under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the fact that the accused-petitioner was on bail during the course of trial and appeal, and the hearing of the revision was likely to take further time.
Final Decision: The application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C. was allowed, and it was ordered that the sentence passed against the petitioner shall remain suspended till final disposal of the revision, and he shall be released on bail with certain conditions.
JUDGMENT
Farjand Ali, J. - The instant application for suspension of sentence has been moved on behalf of the applicant in the matter of judgment dated 25.07.2018 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhinmal, District Jalore in Criminal Case No.314/2005, whereby he was convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment of two years for the offence under Section 304-A IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned trial court as well as the learned appellate court has committed an error of law in appreciating the evidence brought on record, therefore, the material would be required to be appreciated again. The petitioner was on bail during trial and during the course of appeal. Hearing of the revision petition would likely take long time.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
4. Upon consideration of the grounds raised in the memo of the revision, looking to the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, more particularly the facts that the accused-petitioner was on bail during the course of trial and appeal and the hearing of revision is likely to take further more time and considering the overall submissions while refraining from passing any comments on the niceties of the matter and the defects of the prosecution as the same may put an adverse effect on hearing of the revision, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused-petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhinmal in Criminal Case No.314/2005 against the petitioner-applicant Kan Singh S/o Balwant Singh shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid revision and he shall be released on bail provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 08.05.2023 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the revision on the conditions indicated below:-
1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.
2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
AI
The court has the discretion to suspend the sentence under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C. based on the totality of facts and circumstances of the case.
The court may suspend a sentence if the accused are on bail and the appeal process is expected to take a significant amount of time.
The court established that a convicted individual may have their sentence suspended if they were previously on bail and the trial process is prolonged.
The court may suspend a substantive sentence pending appeal if the accused was on bail during trial, subject to conditions.
The court may suspend a substantive sentence and grant bail if there is no imminent hearing for the revision application, ensuring fair treatment of the accused.
The court has the discretion to suspend substantive sentences under Section 389 Cr.P.C. based on the arguments and facts of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.