SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2140

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Farjand Ali, J.
Baldev Singh - Petitioner
Versus
Meva Singh - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.69 of 2023 In S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 331 of 2023
Decided On : 02-05-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. D.S. Gharsana

Headnote:(A) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 397 and 401 - Application for suspension of sentence - Petitioner convicted and sentenced to one year imprisonment and fined Rs. 3,15,000/- under Section 138 - Appeal dismissed - Petitioner, aged 75, in judicial custody, seeking suspension citing long hearing time for revision and willingness to deposit Rs. 57,000/- - Court found grounds sufficient to allow suspension of sentence pending final disposal. (Paras 2, 4, 5)

Findings of Court:
The application for suspension of sentence is granted on the condition that the petitioner deposits Rs. 57,000/- and executes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/-.

Issues: Whether the applicant could be granted suspension of sentence considering his age, health, and willingness to deposit part of the cheque amount.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that in light of the applicant's age, willingness to deposit a portion of the amount, and long potential delays in the hearing of the revision, the suspension of sentence was warranted.

Result: Application allowed.

Table of Content
1. the background of the conviction and sentence. (Para 1)
2. petitioner's contentions regarding trial and appeal. (Para 2)
3. court's considerations for granting suspension of sentence. (Para 3 , 4)
4. grant of suspension of sentence with conditions. (Para 5)

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The instant application for suspension of sentence has been moved on behalf of the applicant in the matter of judgment dated 12.08.2016 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar in Criminal Case No.489/2011, whereby he was convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment of one years for the offence under section 138 of the NI Act with a fine of Rs.3,15,000/- and the judgment dated 16.02.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sri Karanpur, District Sri Ganganagar dismissing the appeal preferred against the aforesaid judgment.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned trial court as well as the learned appellate court has committed an error of law in appreciating the evidence brought on record, therefore, the material would be required to be appreciated again. The petitioner willing to pay an amount of Rs.57,000/- out of the total cheque amount of Rs.1,57,500/- with the trial court at the time of furnishing the bail bonds. The petitioner was on bail during trial and during the course of appeal. Presently he is in judicial custody. He is 75 years old and ailing with several diseases. Hearing of the revision petition would likely take long time.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

4. Upon consideration of the grounds raised in the memo of the revision, looking to the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, more particularly the facts that the petitioner is willing to deposit a sum of Rs.57,000/- with the trial court; he was on bail during the course of trial and appeal and the hearing of revision is likely to take further more time and considering the overall submissions while refraining from passing any comments on the niceties of the matter and the defects of the prosecution as the same may put an adverse effect on hearing of the revision, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused-petitioner.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 397 /401 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar in Criminal Case No.489/2011 against the petitioner-applicant Baldev Singh S/o Ujagar Singh shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid revision provided he deposits a sum of Rs.57,000/- with the trial court and executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 01.06.2023 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the revision on the conditions mentioned below :-

1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top