SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 895

KULDEEP MATHUR
Tarsem Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kaushal Gautam, Advocate, J.V.S. Deora, Advocate, Himmat Jagga, Advocate, Mahipal Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kuldeep Mathur, J. - These bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. arising out of F.I.R. No.369/2022 registered at P.S. Kotwali, District Sriganganagar are being heard and decided by a common order.

2. As per the F.I.R. No.369/2022 lodged by complainant-Ravinder Singh at P.S. Kotwali, District Sriganganagar; the complainant along with 140 persons was duped of hard-earned money to the tune of Rs.32 lakhs on the false pretext of employment made by the petitioners. The complainant was informed by his known, Narendra Singh in the month of September-October, 2022 that Office of District Literacy and Continuous Education, Sriganganagar through District Literacy Authority Committee, Sriganganagar has started one programme, under which 987 volunteer teachers would be appointed for monthly remuneration of Rs.9,300. Narendra Singh further stated that he has also enrolled (admitted) two of his daughters in the aforesaid programme by making payment of Rs.20,000 each. The complainant was then introduced to Tarsem Singh, who presented himself as a Zila Samanvayak, earning Rs.29,500 from the Government against his working in the said programme. Thereafter, the complainant was introduce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top