SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 377

MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Chandrashekhar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Pradeep Kumar Singh, Shalvin, Upendra Kumar Yadav.

JUDGMENT :

MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.

1. Heard Mr. Upendra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Mr. Rizwan Ahmed, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record.

2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Chandrashekhar Prasad with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 122 of 2022, under Sections 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 504 and 506 I.P.C. Police Station-Bhatni, District- Deoria, during pendency of trial.

3. As per the allegations in the FIR, on 04.06.2021 when the informant went to his sister's place, he met one Sanjay. He was told by Sanjay that his nephew Chandra Shekhar Prasad is working in FCI Department and other persons are also required there in the department as employees. On the aforesaid, informant's brother-in-law namely Ram Kishan requested Sanjay to talk to Chandra Shekhar Prasad (nephew of Sanjay) to get few family members appointed in the same. On his request, when Sanjay managed a conversation of the informant with Chandra Shekhar Prasad, he was informed that Rs. 3,50,000/- per person will be required for the appointment in the FCI Department. The informant's brother-in-law requested

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top