SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 978

KULDEEP MATHUR
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.S. Choudhary, Advocate, Pradeep Choudhary, Advocate, Vikram Sharma, Advocate, Varun Arora, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kuldeep Mathur, J. - This application for bail has been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.467/2022, Police Station Naya Shahar, Bikaner for the offences under Sections 307, 341, 323, 147, 148, 149 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners Nos.1 and 2 have not been named in the FIR. However, they have been implicated in the case on the basis of the statements of the interested witnesses recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C.

4. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner No.3 has not even been named by the injured in his statement. He also submits that this Court has already enlarged one co-accused Aaidan on bail vide order dated 03.01.2023 (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.15206/2022).

5. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners are behind the bars and the trial of the case will take time. Therefore, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

6. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed this bail application.

7. Having regard to t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top