SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 977

KULDEEP MATHUR
Bablu @ Balla Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kalu Ram Bhati, Advocate, S.D. Chavariya, Advocate, Vikram Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kuldeep Mathur, J. - This application for bail has been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.409/2022, Police Station Mandal, Bhilwara for the offences under Sections 452, 323 and 365/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the injuries said to have been received by the daughter of the complainant have not been attributed to the present petitioners. He further submits that even otherwise injuries received are simple in nature.

4. The petitioners are behind the bars and the trial will take time.

5. Therefore, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

6. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed this bail application.

7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

8. Consequently, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that petitioners (1) Bablu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top