SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 989

MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Imran – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vinod Kumar Sihag, Advocate, Mukhtiyaar Khan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Madan Gopal Vyas, J. - The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.589/2022 of Police Station Nohar, Hanumangarh for the offences punishable under Sections 8/21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.

4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

5. Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners, (1) Rahul S/o Bhagta Ram Saini, and (2) Imran S/o Hasan Khan shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.589/2022 of Police

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top