SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1022

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Tara Devi – Appellant
Versus
Chand Mal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Narendra Thanvi, for the Appellant; Mr. D.D. Chitlangi, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 09/10/2013 passed by learned Rent Tribunal, Bhilwara and the order dated 09/03/2022 passed by learned Appellate Rent Tribunal, Bhilwara. By the orders impugned, the application preferred by the petitioner for transposition in place of Chand Mal and the application for passing the order of maintaining status quo has been rejected.

3. Brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that Chand Mal preferred an application under Section 9(A) of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 against the respondent No.2 -Kailash Chandra Kalya. The application preferred by Chand Mal was pending consideration before the learned Rent Tribunal, Bhilwara. During the pendency of the application preferred by Chand Mal, the petitioner being the sister of Chand Mal preferred an application for impleading her as party respondent and the same was allowed. After impleading the petitioner as party respondent in the matter, she preferred two applications before Rent Tribunal, Bhilwara, wherein a prayer was made that the petitioner may be transposed in place of Chand Mal and the second app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top