SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1086

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Manishankar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pankaj Mehta, Advocate, Vikram Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.084/2022, Police Station Anandpuri, District Banswara registered for the offences punishable under Sections 148, 452, 325 and 307/149 of the IPC.

2. The first bail application was dismissed as not pressed by this Court vide order dated 04.07.2022 with liberty to file afresh after recording the statement of the injured, Thavar Chand.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that injured Thavar Chand has been examined as PW.1 before the trial Court and in his statement, a specific allegation has been made that the present petitioner along with co-accused Bansi and other persons gave beating and caused injuries on his head. According to perusal of the injury report, only injury on his head has been found as grievous in nature and dangerous to life. No specific averment has been made against the present petitioner. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 24.03.2022 and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. With these submissions, it is prayed that the benefit of bail may

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top