SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2177

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Gopal Singh Bhati, Advocate, Vikram Sharma, Advocate, Teja Ram, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.376/2021, Police Station Sanchore, Distt. Jalore for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307/34 of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present bail application qua petitioner No.1-Suresh Kumar at this Stage. Accordingly, the criminal bail application qua petitioner No.1 is dismissed as not pressed at this stage.

3. So far as petitioner No.2-Bhagirathram is concerned, learned counsel submits that an allegation has been levelled against the petitioner No.2 that he inflicted injury on left arm of the injured, but according to the injury report, the injury received by the injured on left arm is found to be simple in nature. The petitioner No.2 is in judicial custody since his arrest and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of petitioner No.2.

5. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top