SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1994

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Aamin – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vishal Sharma, Advocate, Mahipal Bishnoi, Advocate, Shambhoo Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.24/2022, Police Station Deedwana for the offence under Sections 143, 308, 323, 325, 341 & 504 IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present case is a cross-case in which injuries have been received by both sides. It can not be ascertained at this stage as to which of the side was the aggressor. It is further stated that grievous injuries sustained by the complainant party are on the non-vital part of the body and the doctor has specifically mentioned that no injury is found to be dangerous to life. The petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel appearing for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application and submit that two injured received head injuries and challan of the case has not been presented before the competent court. In these circumstances, the petitioner may not be released on bail.

4. I have consider

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top