Back
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER
1. This Criminal Appeal has been preferred under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. praying for the following reliefs:-
"It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to allow this criminal appeal and the impugned judgment and order dated 14.06.2017 passed by learned Special Judge, Electricity Act Cases, Jalore, convicting and sentencing the appellant for the offence under Sections 138 of the Act of 2003, may kindly be quashed and set aside and the appellant may kindly be acquitted for the said offence."
2. The matter pertains to an incident that occurred in the year 2013 and the present appeal has been pending since 2017.
3. Vide impugned judgment dated 14.06.2017, the learned Special Judge, Electricity Act Cases, Jalore in Session Case No.5/2013 convicted the accused-appellant for the offence under Section 138 of Electricity Act and sentenced him to undergo one year imprisonment, along with a fine of Rs. 10,000/-, default in payment of which he was ordered to further undergo three months’ simple imprisonment.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant has pointed out that the accused-appellant has deposited the civil liability of Rs.9,35,777/-, which is noted
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application and interpretation of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 in granting the benefit of probation to the accused-appella....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of an accused-appellant, with no criminal antecedents, to the benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on the legi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the applicability and benefit of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 to the case of the accused-appellant convicted under Section 138....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of accused-appellants to the benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on their lack of criminal antecedents and....
The court's decision was influenced by the absence of criminal antecedents of the accused-appellant and the legislative intent of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the accused-appellants to the benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on the absence of criminal antecedents a....
The court applied the legislative intent of the Probation of Offenders Act and previous decisions to extend the benefit of Section 4 to the accused-appellant, allowing release on probation with speci....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to extend the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on the legislative intent of the Act an....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the accused-appellant to the benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 based on the absence of criminal antecedents and....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
