IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Rameshwar Vyas, J.
Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Sita Devi & Ors. – Respondent
S. B. Civil First Appeal No. 231/2021
Decided On : 18-04-2022
Fatal Accidents Act - Negligence in maintaining electricity lines - Act of 1885 - [Fatal Accidents Act, 1885] - [Section 174 of Cr.P.C.]
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiffs filed a civil suit seeking compensation under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1885, alleging negligence in maintaining electricity lines by the defendants, resulting in electrocution of the deceased. The trial court decreed the suit, awarding compensation of Rs. 8,88,652/- with interest. The defendants appealed against the judgment.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the incident was reported to the police, and an inquest concluded that the death was due to electrocution from an electricity pole. The court also noted the testimony of an eye-witness and the failure of the defendants to rebut the evidence. It held the defendants jointly liable for maintaining the electricity lines and upheld the compensation awarded by the trial court, modifying the rate of interest.
Issues: The issues revolved around the negligence in maintaining the electricity lines, liability of the defendants, credibility of witnesses, and the quantum of compensation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the defendants were jointly liable for maintaining the electricity lines and failed to exonerate themselves from responsibility. It also emphasized the importance of conducting an inquiry after such incidents and upheld the compensation awarded by the trial court.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, affirming the trial court's judgment on liability and compensation, with a modification in the rate of interest.
JUDGMENT
1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present first appeal is being finally decided at admission stage.
2. The instant first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed by the defendants-appellants -Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited against the Judgment & Decree dated 18.03.2021 passed by the Additional District Judge No. 7, Jodhpur Metropolitan in Civil Original Suit No. 68/2019 titled as ’Smt. Sita Devi & ors. Vs. Jd.V.V.N.L. & ors’, whereby the civil suit filed by the plaintiffs-respondents under the provisions of Fatal Accidents Act, 1885 for grant of compensation, was decreed.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs (respondents herein) filed a civil suit under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1885 (afterwards referred to as ’the Act of 1885’) seeking compensation against the defendants (appellants herein) as well as Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur (respondent No. 6 herein) alleging inter alia that on account of gross negligence in maintaining the electricity lines by the Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited and the Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur, Bhagwandas Valmiki got electrocuted. The plaintiffs in their plaint alleged that on 07.06.2002, Bhagwandas Valmiki (since deceased) was passing through main road near Chili & Garlic Restaurant, Jaljog Choraha, Jodhpur. At around 9.30 P.M., he got electrocuted by an electricity pole on account of negligence of the Jd.V.V.N.L. and the Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur in maintaining their electricity lines. The defendants did not maintain the poles and electricity lines properly. The plaintiffs sought compensation of Rs. 35,07,000/- from the defendants under the provisions of the Act of 1885. The defendants filed their written statements and denied that there was any negligency whatsoever, in maintaining the electricity lines. It was pleaded that tubular pole where incident was alleged to have happened was situated on a road divider and there was no passing way near tubular pole. Not only this, the pole was guarded by fencing and therefore, no fault could be assigned so far as maintenance of electricity lines by the defendants was concerned. The trial court, after trial and hearing the arguments of both the parties, passed Judgment & Decree dated 18.03.2021 decreeing the suit filed by the plaintiffs-respondents and directed the defendants - Jd.V.V.N.L. and Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur to pay compensation of Rs. 8,88,652/- along with interest @ 9% per annum to the plaintiffs from the date of filing of the suit till realization of money. Aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 18.03.2021, this first appeal has been filed by the defendants-appellants -Jd.V.V.N.L. arraying plaintiffs and Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur as party respondents.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the trial court.
5. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the incident was suspicious. After the incident, claim was settled by the owner of Chili and Garlic Restaurant, under whom the deceased was employed. The incident took place in front of the restaurant. No independent witness was produced on behalf of the plaintiffs to prove the incident. P.W. 1 - Smt. Sita Devi was wife of the deceased, who was not present on the spot at the time of incident. P.W. 2 - Arjun Singh is not an independent witness. His presence at the time of incident is doubtful. He further submitted that after the incident, line was checked by the officials of the Jd.V.V.N.L. but no fault was found in the line. The pole, where the incident alleged to have happened, was encircled by fencing. Hence, there was no occasion for the deceased to come in contact with the pole. The trial court erred in disbelieving the defence put up by the appellants. The amount of compensation awarded by the trial court is also grossly excessive. He further submitted that after installing the poles and electricity line, it were handed over to the Municipal Co
AI
The main legal point established is that the defendants were jointly liable for maintaining the electricity lines under the Fatal Accidents Act, and the importance of conducting inquiries after such ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principle of res ipsa loquitur, the concept of strict liability, and the duty of the electricity department to maintain elec....
The principle of strict liability applies to cases involving the negligence of the electricity department in maintaining electric lines, making the department absolutely liable to compensate the vict....
Multiplier to be adopted would be of 15 only as age of deceased was 38 years at time of accident.
Electricity providers are strictly liable for accidents caused by negligence in maintaining infrastructure, with compensation calculated based on the deceased's earnings and family dependency.
The principle of strict liability applies to the Electricity Board, which is bound to compensate the claimants for accidents related to its functioning.
The principle of strict liability and vicarious liability applies when an accident occurs due to negligence in maintaining electricity lines, making the department liable to compensate sufferers.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.