SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 439

State of Rajasthan through Chairman Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Guddi Bai widow of late Jagdish Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. This first appeal under Section 96 CPC has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 5-5-2015 passed by the Additional District Judge Chhabra, in Suit No.7/2013, whereby and whereunder decreeing the suit claiming compensation under Section 1-A of the Indian Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 allowed compensation Rs.8,16,280/-to plaintiffs against appellant JVVNL on account of death of their husband and father due to electrocution.

2. The facts of the case are that respondents plaintiffs (hereafter `the plaintiffs’) filed a civil suit claiming compensation on account of accidental death of their husband, son and father Jagdish, aged 35 years, who died on 16-8-2011 because of electrocution, while he was driving pick-up RJ-28-GA-0958. It was averred that on 16-8-2011 at 8.00 AM while Jagdish was driving pick-up, along with Bablu @ Charan Singh and Banti @ Rajbhan, from Bhojpur to Kadaiyahat, just after village Kotdapar near the house of Badri Lal Aheer while pick-up was crossing the gravel road came into contact of electricity line of 11000 KV, which was loose, Jagdish b

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top