SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 772

MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Vinita Soni W/o Samarth Soni – Appellant
Versus
Samarth S/o Shri Mahesh Soni – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Devesh A. Purohit.

JUDGMENT :

MADAN GOPAL VYAS, J.

1. The present transfer petition under Section 24 of CPC has been preferred by the petitioner-wife for transferring the Case No. 192/2022 preferred by the respondent herein under Section 13A of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, from the court of learned Judge, Family Court-II, Bikaner to the court of learned Addl. District Judge No. 1, Rajgarh, Churu.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. preferred by the petitioner is pending before the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Taranagar, District Churu. Thus it is prayed that application under Section 13A of Hindu Marriage Act may also be transferred to the court of learned Addl. District Judge No. 1, Rajgarh, Churu.

3. Despite service nobody appeared on behalf of the respondent.

4. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vinisha Jitesh Tolani @ Manmeet Laghmani vs. Jitesh Kishore Tolani, 2010 (1) WLC (SC) 705 has observed that in the matrimonial proceedings initiated by the husband against the wife the convenience of the wife has to be considered for contesting the suit, and accordingly the matrimonial proceedings ought to be transferred where the wife

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top