IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
MADAN GOPAL VYAS, J.
Sapna Paliwal D/o Shri Radhey Shyam Paliwal – Petitioner
Versus
Ganpat Lal S/o Shri Champa Lal Paliwal – Respondent
S.B. Civil Transfer Application No. 196 of 2022
Decided On : 15-09-2023
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 24 - Hindu Marriage Act 1955 - Section 9 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 125 - Transfer petition - Matrimonial proceedings - Transfer petition has been preferred by petitioner-wife for transferring Case preferred by respondent from Family Court, Balotra to Family Court, Bhilwara – Held, Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Vinisha Jitesh Tolani @ Manmeet Laghmani vs. Jitesh Kishore Tolani, has observed that in matrimonial proceedings initiated by husband against wife convenience of wife has to be considered for contesting suit, and accordingly matrimonial proceedings ought to be transferred where wife is residing - Court deems it appropriate to transfer petition under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act from Family Court, Balotra to Family Court, Bhilwara - Petition is allowed.
JUDGMENT :
MADAN GOPAL VYAS, J.
1. The present transfer petition under Section 24 of CPC has been preferred by the petitioner-wife for transferring the Case No. 31/2022 preferred by the respondent herein under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, from the Family Court, Balotra to Family Court, Bhilwara.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. preferred by the petitioner is pending before the Family Court, Bhilwara. Thus it is prayed that application under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act may also be transferred to Family Court, Bhilwara.
3. Learned counsel appearing for respondent opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vinisha Jitesh Tolani @ Manmeet Laghmani vs. Jitesh Kishore Tolani, 2010 (1) WLC (SC) 705 has observed that in the matrimonial proceedings initiated by the husband against the wife the convenience of the wife has to be considered for contesting the suit, and accordingly the matrimonial proceedings ought to be transferred where the wife is residing.
5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to transfer the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act from Family Court, Balotra to the Family Court, Bhilwara.
6. The transfer petition is allowed accordingly.
7. It is ordered that the Civil Case No. 31/2022 under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, pending before the Family Court, Balotra be transferred to the Family Court, Bhilwara.
8. The learned Family Court, Balotra is directed to send the record of the case to Family Court, Bhilwara.
9. Both the parties are directed to appear before Family Court, Bhilwara on 9.10.2023.
10. Learned Family Court, Bhilwara is directed to expedite the trial of the case.
In matrimonial proceedings initiated by the husband against the wife, the convenience of the wife must be considered for contesting the suit, and the court may transfer the proceedings accordingly.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.