SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1263

KULDEEP MATHUR
Radheshyam S/o Likhma Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Vikas Bijarnia.
For the Respondent: Arun Kumar.
For the Complainant : Moti Singh.

JUDGMENT :

KULDEEP MATHUR, J.

1. The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the FIR No. 215/2022 registered at Police Station Rajgarh, District Churu for the offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC.

2. As per the FIR, the complainant-respondent No. 2 Mohammed Naseem son of Abdul Gani submitted a written report before PS concerned alleging inter alia that there is a property named Swami Tower located in Sheetla Bazaar, Rajgarh, District Churu with many shops constructed inside it, whose owners are accused-petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 3 namely Radheshyam, Sumitra and Nand Lal respectively.

3. As per the FIR, on 29.06.2020, around 9 am, one Jagdish Kumar @ Jugal Mistry visited the house of the complainant-respondent No. 2 and told him that the Swami Tower situated in Sheetla Bazaar is for sale, since a lot of financial debt has accrued over the said property. Jagdish Kumar @ Jugal Mistry further told the complainant-respondent No. 2 that he will facilitate the purchase of the said property, if the complainant-respond

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top