SANJAY DHAR
Champa Kumari Gupta, wife of Sh. Ganda Mal Gupta – Appellant
Versus
UT of J. &K. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Through the medium of afore-titled four petitions filed under Section 482 CrPC, the petitioners have challenged FIR No. 0013/2021 for offences under Sections 420/120-B RPC registered with Crime Branch, Jammu. Since all the petitioners have challenged the same FIR, as such, these petitions are being taken up together for their disposal.
2. The impugned FIR owes its origin to a written complaint lodged by the complainant/respondent No.2 with respondent No.1-Crime Branch, Jammu on 04.03.2021. As per the allegations made in the said complaint, petitioners Rakesh Kumar Gupta and Ravinder Gupta introduced respondent No.2/complainant to petitioner Champa Kumari somewhere in the month of June, 2012 and represented that she is owner of a residential house bearing No. 20/2nd Ext. Gandhi Nagar,Jammu built over land measuring 01 kanal and that she is intending to sell the said House. It was alleged that complainant expressed his willingness to purchase the said house. Accordingly, sale consideration was settled at Rs.1,92,00,000/-. It was further alleged in the complaint that an Agreement to Sell was executed between the complainant and petitioner Champa Kumari on 30.07.2012 and
M/s Indian Oil Corporation vs. M/S NEPC India Ltd. & Ors.
Madhavrao Jiwaji Rao Scindia v. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre
State of Haryana vs. Bhajanlal
Rupan Deol Bajaj vs. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Duncans Agro Industries Ltd.
State of Bihar vs. Rajendra Agrawalla
Rajesh Bajaj v. State NCT of Delhi
Medchl Chemicals & Pharma (P) Ltd. v. Biological E. Ltd.
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma v. State of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.